Previous Page  38 / 160 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 160 Next Page
Page Background

March

2017

HYDROCARBON

ENGINEERING

36

diagnostic inspections and preventive maintenance

according to fixed schedules. This is a costly,

labour-intensive process with little assurance that failure

will not occur between inspections.

To improve efficiency, companies have implemented

advanced process control (APC), defined operating

boundaries with their alarm system, created key

performance indicators (KPIs), and called upon local

experts to help solve operating problems. The

effectiveness of these measures has been difficult to

sustain as they rely on dedicated and knowledgeable

on-site personnel.

In addition, industrial firms are looking for ways to make

sense of vast quantities of data that can have a significant

impact on their performance. For instance, reporting and

interpreting of alarms and alerts is central to safe

operations. It is also important to act upon abnormal

situations quickly and effectively.

To support the variety of monitoring and decision

support applications necessary within a manufacturing

facility, data needs to be turned into information and

delivered with context so it can be understood and used in

a myriad of ways by various people.

Operational objectives

For manufacturers and other operating companies, asset

failure and almost imperceptible reductions in process and

equipment efficiency are constant threats to the operating

plan and overall equipment effectiveness (OEE). As a result,

they are shifting their spending to increased equipment

maintenance, and thus losing potential revenue. Factors

such as availability of skilled workers and increasingly

complex production processes are impacting the ability to

predict and detect deteriorating asset health and process

performance.

To maximise their overall performance, modern plants

are looking for ways to transform their operating and

maintenance philosophy from ‘break-fix’ to keeping

operations running as efficiently and steadily as possible

while decreasing unplanned downtime.

Key operational objectives include the following:

„

Deploy online, continuous monitoring and

exception-based alerts for process performance,

equipment, and controls.

„

Capitalise on increased data availability across the

enterprise.

„

Put data into context so as to compare assets to

determine similar conditions or behaviour.

„

Implement tools for process and reliability engineers,

enabling visual data exploration to decrease reliance

on complex machine learning algorithms to solve

problems.

„

Establish collaboration with both internal and external

subject matter experts (SMEs).

Integrated, operational and maintenance strategies

open up new possibilities for companies. Data from sensors

monitoring both process and machine conditions are

combined to identify any patterns that indicate a possible

fault or process limitation. This allows the onset of a

stoppage to be recognised early, and corrective measures

to be planned and introduced in the most effective way.

Combining both process and equipment data leads to

truly understanding asset capability, and enables the

definition of accurate, consistent operating and integrity

envelopes that can be used in APC strategies. The result is

greater process stability within control and monitoring

systems for situational awareness at all levels of operations,

as well as improved decision support systems to ensure

assets are operated in an optimal manner. With this

approach, unplanned downtime can be avoided, and both

staff and resources can be employed more effectively.

Leveraging IIoT

There is no doubt the IIoT carries major implications for

industry, especially at a time when infrastructure is ageing

and veteran operators and engineers are retiring. There is

a shortage of experienced workers to take the place of

seasoned personnel, resulting in a loss of knowledge. The

IIoT can be leveraged to institutionalise knowledge

capture while requiring fewer internal experts. This can be

carried out with the help of external experts, such as

process licensors, who have expertise and visibility

beyond the company’s assets. Moreover, the IIoT can have

a significant impact on competitiveness as manufacturers

struggle to pull their weight in the global economic

recovery.

The IIoT allows companies to do more with their

current systems and extend their business processes to

enhance monitoring and reduce the time to action. For

example, a cloud-based control loop and APC monitoring

system can be set up to monitor controls across the

enterprise by an internal or external domain expert. With

visibility and knowledge across sites, experts can alert and

collaborate with site SMEs and recommend actions when

control benefit degradations are detected. Each site can

benefit from earlier detection and faster resolution of

problems afforded by a higher level of expertise focused

on control performance. For the enterprise, these

capabilities can be deployed using fewer resources than

having an expert at each site.

Figure 1.

Equipment failures have a significant impact

on industrial operations, making it imperative to

optimise predictive maintenance strategies.