Previous Page  117 / 160 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 117 / 160 Next Page
Page Background

chemicals is involved. As written and interpreted by OSHA,

the Mechanical Integrity provisions apply to all equipment

that is “critical to process safety” (see 29 C.F.R. § 1910.119(j)).

The Rule lists six types of equipment that are always

considered critical, and, according to OSHA, the standards

apply equally to equipment that each employer deems

“critical to process safety.” The Rule’s Appendix suggests

that these requirements apply to “second line of defense”

systems, which “control or mitigate hazardous chemicals

once an unwanted release occurs.” This must include

employee-occupied structures, which can control or

mitigate the impact on workers of a release (see 29 C.F.R. §

1910.119, App. C). Once applied, these provisions ensure

employee safety by requiring documentation of the safe

materials, processes, and testing used to construct the

modules or buildings.

Due to this standard, some companies have

disallowed non-mechanical integrity compliant or

non-purpose built BRMs (i.e. converted shipping

containers) within blast zones. Although shipping

containers were built to stringent ISO standards, primarily

in China, the conversion process to BRMs is not as precise

as purpose built BRMs. For example, steel structural

members are welded inside the container and against the

exterior wall, but because of a lack of space, a seam weld

is unable to be adequately applied on all four sides. The

result is that an unprimed, un-welded seem is susceptible

to rust and corrosion, either through condensation or

water seepage in the belly pan. Corrosion that is not

accounted for in the engineering calculations can

compromise the integrity of the assigned blast rating.

Conclusion

Despite what may be a common misperception, BRMs are

not mutually interchangeable between different suppliers.

BRMs are not a commodity, but rather highly engineered

structures designed to be the last line of defense for those

who have to work within blast zones. For those who are

faced with the task of selecting a BRM, the applicable, acid

test question might be: what building you would want to

occupy if you were the one occupying it? When

considering two apparently identical BRMs with similar

blast ratings, it is important to consider module weight and

the space between the exterior and interior walls. It is also

important that a manufacturer has detailed construction

documentation, extensive product testing and ongoing

maintenance procedures that maintain the building to its

original specifications.

Considering that BRMs are the last line of defense for

those who work in the process areas, common sense safety

factors should be considered when making either a buying

or rental decision.

References

1.

https://blog.safetyculture.com/industry-trends/fatal-four-

construction-safety-infographic.

2.

https://www.osha.gov/Publications/safety-health-addvalue.html.