Previous Page  116 / 160 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 116 / 160 Next Page
Page Background

March

2017

HYDROCARBON

ENGINEERING

114

API RP 752 is a recommended practice to provide

guidance for managing the risk from explosions, fires and

toxic material releases to on-site personnel located in new

and existing buildings intended for occupancy. Moreover,

this RP was developed for use at refineries, petrochemical

and chemical operations, NGLs extraction plants, natural

gas liquefaction plants, and other onshore facilities covered

by OSHA 29 CFR 1910.119.

Shortly thereafter, blast rated modules (BRMs) were

introduced to the market and, to a large degree, have

replaced wood framed trailers in blast prone areas. As

BRMs became more acceptable, larger buildings that

required a blast resistant rating and larger open spaces

(such as control rooms, laboratories, tool cribs, lunchrooms,

administrative buildings, etc.), were built modularly and

scalable through fastening BRMs together. This

customisable concept has mostly replaced site built steel

reinforced concrete structures.

BRMs are now commonplace in chemical plants and

refineries. From the outside, many BRM’s from various

suppliers look identical. However, it is what is on the inside

that counts.

Although there are exceptions, the general blast rating

standard established in the chemical and refining industry is

a peak free-field pressure of 8 psi, 200 ms, medium damage

(MD) rating. Often, when a BRM is requested, the typical

considerations are blast ratings and price.

When evaluating BRMs in relation to site safety or risk

management implications, there are multiple factors that

should be considered.

Weight of BRM

Steel is typically the most expensive item in a BRM. It can

be assumed that the heavier the BRM, the more steel was

used, and therefore the more it costs. As a means of

lowering costs, weight/steel is often engineered out of

BRM designs.

Many BRMs are engineered to be unanchored and able

to be placed on the ground or a concrete pad, designed to

slide in the event of a blast. In an event, inhabitants in the

BRM would likely be subjected to kinetic energy. The

velocity of the building during a blast can cause furniture,

computer monitors, filing cabinets, microwaves, etc., to

move very quickly inside the building, which

may cause injury.

The study of injury biomechanics evaluates

how injuries are caused and how they can be

prevented. By considering the human body as a

structure from the engineering perspective,

one can analyse an event to determine how

injury occurred and how the injury pattern

might be altered or eliminated under a

different set of circumstances.

Newton’s first law of motion states that a

body at rest will stay at rest until a net external

force acts upon it. Assuming the same

dimensions, a heavier object will move less

than a lighter object when subjected to the

same force.

Therefore, as a baseline consideration,

weight can be advantageous. Considering an unanchored or

slide design BRM, its weight is proportional to the

movement that occurs in the blast. Increased weight results

in less movement and therefore lowers ones exposure to

injury.

Wall deflection

One of the ‘fatal four’ items is ‘struck by objects’. The

damage level of the BRM indicates the degree of deflection

of the exterior wall in the event of a blast. Low damage

denotes little to no deflection by the exterior wall, and

high damage indicates significant wall deflection. The low

damaged building would likely be able to be reused, while

the high damage building would likely be unusable.

The significance of the wall deflection emerges as a

consideration when evaluating the biodynamic effects to

occupants who are in the building at the time of an event.

Simply stated, for any item that is either mounted or

attached to the wall, it is capable of becoming a projectile

if the interior wall is penetrated by a millisecond thrust

from the exterior wall. Also, non-structural items, such as

lighting and power panels that are wall mounted, can

become compromised during a blast and may cause fire or

electrocutions.

The construction methods of suppliers vary with regard

to wall deflection. Some BRM suppliers accommodate for

these potential risks by allowing an adequate space

between the exterior wall and the interior wall. On a 12 ft

wide module (exterior dimensions), the inside space

becomes quite valuable. Some suppliers may decide to

forego space for an added layer of safety.

Mechanical integrity

Although OSHA has not explicitly ruled on ‘blast

resistance’, some BRM manufacturers have interpreted that

Mechanical Integrity requirements (part of OSHA’s Process

Safety Management (PSM) rule), 29 C.F.R. § 1910.119(j), apply

to BRMs and have self-imposed this standard on their

company and processes.

OSHA’s PSM Rule already broadly requires that

adequately protective, quality materials with integrity are

used in hazardous applications, particularly where the use,

storage, manufacturing, or handling of highly hazardous

Figure 1.

A 12 ft. x 40 ft. blast resistant building.